Beyond our commercial and corporate framework, we consider the protection and promotion of freedoms and human rights as implicit to our ethos and a key object to our existence. Our practitioners have extensive experience seeking to protect and enshrine rights dealing with claims against police, wrongful arrest immigration appeals and judicial review. Reported caselaw that our practitioners have been instructed on include:

The Christian Institute v Google Ireland Limited (2008)

National Secular Society & Anor, R (on the application of) v Bideford Town Council [2012] EWHC 175 (Admin) (10 February 2012)

Bull & Bull v Hall & Preddy [2012] EWCA Civ 83 (10 February 2012)

Bull & Anor v Hall & Anor [2013] UKSC 73 (27 November 2013)

Black & Anor v Wilkinson [2013] EWCA Civ 820 (09 July 2013)

EWEIDA AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM - 48420/10 36516/10 51671/10 59842/10 - HEJUD [2013] ECHR 37 (15 January 2013)

Smith v Trafford Housing Trust [2012] EWHC 3221 (Ch) (16 November 2012)

Joseph Henry Roberts and another v Wyre Borough Council and The Chief Constable of Lancashire (2006)

London Christian Radio Ltd & Anor, R (on the application of) v Radio Advertising Clearance Centre, Court of Appeal - Civil Division, November 19, 2013, [2013] EWCA Civ 1495